LA times highlight another Neocon proposal. This time the proposal came not from The Heritage but from The Washington Institute for Near East Studies.

Their doctrine is: “If the potential risks, challenges and consequences of prevention (as previously outlined) are daunting, the risks and challenges of deterrence are even more so. Deterrence is not an easy, low-risk alternative. The cost/benefit calculus pertaining to prevention versus deterrence as a means of dealing with Iran’s nuclear program may be one of the most complex and difficult policy choices facing U.S. policymakers today, given the uncertainties of the prospects for success and the possible price of failure for each.”

I think they are in the state of one of these three possibilities:

  1. They are very naive and stupid, even though they regard themselves as scholars
  2. They have wrong inputs, thus produce wrong outputs
  3. They have a hidden agenda

I believe in no 3 :) sound like a conspiracy theory??? haha

Please read the above articles with this article. Happy reading…

Time Magazine has quoted a former senior intelligence in Israel.

“I’m worried that by November it’s going to be too late,” to stop Iran from gaining the ability to produce nuclear weapons, said Yossi Kuperwasser, the former senior intelligence officer for the Central Command of the Israeli Defense. On military action against nuclear sites in Iran, he said, “Just do it. For Christ’s sake, do it and solve our problem.”

And something more interesting also:

Following Bush’s visit this month, the Jerusalem Post reported that a senior U.S. advisor on the trip had told Israeli officials that Bush was prepared to attack Iran, but that Gates and Rice were blocking the way.

If you read until this section, then I would like to give some present :) There is a conspiracy theory like video about electric car in Google’s video.

Iran, you next

No related posts.