Thu 12 Mar 2009
You Can Critics US Gov, but not Israel
Posted by arully under HumanRight , Law&Ethics , Politics , StrategyNo Comments
Interesting quote from Andrew Sullivan article related about Freeman nomination as Director of National Intelligence Council:
Obama may bring change in many areas, but there is no possibility of change on the Israel-Palestine question. Having the kind of debate in America that they have in Israel, let alone Europe, on the way ahead in the Middle East is simply forbidden. Even if a president wants to have differing sources of advice on many questions, the Congress will prevent any actual, genuinely open debate on Israel. More to the point: the Obama peeps never defended Freeman. They were too scared. The fact that Obama blinked means no one else in Washington will ever dare to go through the hazing that Freeman endured. And so the chilling effect is as real as it is deliberate.
Salon.com also has an article reporting about this, but major news outlet muted.
(updated 090312) Washington Post editorial put blame on Freeman while the reader differ with that assessment
Recorded report from Al-Jazeera:
(updated 090313) NYT has a report about this
Related posts:
- Israel ‘own’ US?
- Obama and Israeli PM meet amid dispute
- Ethical Question: who owns your allegiance? US & Israel relations
- Israel military: Palestinians risked a “shoah” (holocaust)
- Perspective from Israel Side
